Known declared pile across datasets
legislator records totals appear when the snapshot loads.
India's most ambitious public record of the wealth declared by elected representatives—across assemblies, Parliament, parties and elections.
Search sitting MLAs, 2024 Lok Sabha general-election winners and sitting Rajya Sabha MPs in one ledger.
| # | House | Representative | Constituency | Trail |
|---|
Showing 0 of 0 matching representatives · Select a representative name to inspect the declaration trail.
Search MyNeta-analyzed records imported from discovered election folders.
Average declared assets across sitting legislators in the active ledger, ranked high to low. Open the full map →
The southern and western states dominate the top of the current declared-asset index.
Tap a state block to filter the wealth tablelegislator records totals appear when the snapshot loads.
NetaWorth organizes election-affidavit declarations into a searchable public ledger. Figures come from ECI, ADR and MyNeta; every record keeps its source link for verification.
The internal database contains 1,81,307 MyNeta-analyzed candidate records imported from 136 reviewed election folders through 2026. It also contains 4,092 sitting MLAs from the ADR 2025 snapshot, 543 winners from the 2024 Lok Sabha general election (not a current-membership claim), and 229 of 233 sitting Rajya Sabha MPs analyzed by ADR as of 17 March 2026. The Rajya Sabha report notes one vacant seat and three unavailable affidavits; unpublished liabilities and case counts stay unavailable rather than becoming zero. The archive also contains 17,785 imported historical-winner records through 2026 and 10,243 asset comparisons spanning 2004—2025. Exact-name histories are useful leads, while verified growth timelines require state, election year, normalized name and exact asset values to agree. Constituency labels remain as published and may reflect delimitation or spelling changes; ambiguous same-label winner groups are omitted rather than merged into a false seat history. Check the cited primary affidavit before investigative or legal use.